Latest Discussions - COMSOL Forums https://www.comsol.com/forum/ Most recent forum discussions Fri, 10 May 2024 04:00:47 +0000 COMSOL Forum: Latest Discussions https://www.comsol.com/shared/images/logos/comsol_logo.gif https://www.comsol.com/forum/ Questions about background reduced field in comsol Magnetic field module? https://www.comsol.com/forum/thread/339383/Questions-about-background-reduced-field-in-comsol-Magnetic-field-module?last=2024-05-10T04:00:47Z <p>In the frequency domain research mode of comsol, we want to apply an AC magnetic field superimposed by a DC magnetic field, in which the AC field is applied through the coil. Can we regard it as a DC magnetic field by setting the background reduced field to a constant(In the two-dimensional axisymmetric model, the background field is set as the axial uniform magnetic flux density and is a constant) ? Or is the background reduced field a DC magnetic field or an AC magnetic field in the frequency domain? THANKS!</p> Fri, 10 May 2024 04:00:47 +0000 4.2024-05-10 04:00:47.339383 Ionic motion in dielectric substrate: structure alterations https://www.comsol.com/forum/thread/339382/Ionic-motion-in-dielectric-substrate-structure-alterations?last=2024-05-09T20:43:23Z <p>Hi, I am simulating ionic migration in dielectric substrates under electric field. I am using electrostatic and transport of diluted species. Everything is fine up to this point.</p> <p>When the positive ions move from the positive electrode to the negative, for glassy structures, I want to alter the structure left behind. Experimentally this is achieve by applying electric field and temperature. When the ions move, the structure changes in that region as one of the mechanisms of charge compensation.</p> <p>How can I simulate this changes in structure?!</p> <p>Thanks in advance!!!</p> Thu, 09 May 2024 20:43:23 +0000 4.2024-05-09 20:43:23.339382 CFD module https://www.comsol.com/forum/thread/339373/CFD-module?last=2024-05-09T18:01:48Z <p>What is the difference between "slip" and "Navier slip" in the "wall" condition of a "laminar flow" module? As we all know, in microchannels, surface tension, EDL and other factors will affect the flow rate. How to couple multiple factors into the flow rate? In the wall setting, only one of the factors such as slip type and electroosmotic speed can be selected. Can all of them be coupled into a microchannel model? Could you please provide me with a detailed procedure or case? Thank you.</p> Thu, 09 May 2024 14:49:51 +0000 4.2024-05-09 14:49:51.339373 Precipitation and Evaporation in Porous Media settings https://www.comsol.com/forum/thread/339353/Precipitation-and-Evaporation-in-Porous-Media-settings?last=2024-05-09T13:06:11Z <p>Hi!</p> <p>I am currently modeling a 2D Porous media simulation in a coastal settings.</p> <p>Here, I would like to simulate how salt content evolve overtime. I have the precipitation and evaporation data at the moment. However, I recall COMSOL does not allow inlet and outlet condition within one boundary (i.e., top soil layer).</p> <p>are there any suggestions on this matter?</p> Thu, 09 May 2024 13:06:11 +0000 4.2024-05-09 13:06:11.339353 How to Obtain a 2D Projection Averaging Concentration Along the Z Axis? https://www.comsol.com/forum/thread/339341/How-to-Obtain-a-2D-Projection-Averaging-Concentration-Along-the-Z-Axis?last=2024-05-09T12:50:33Z <p>Hello everyone,</p> <p>I'm currently working on a simulation involving the mixing of two products within a microfluidic chip using COMSOL Multiphysics. I have successfully completed the simulation, but now I'm trying to generate a 2D projection of the average concentration in the XY plane by averaging values along the Z axis. This way, I can directly compare the simulated results with my experimental data.</p> <ul> <li>The Challenges I'm Facing: I have tried using the Results section and the various Data Sets options, but I couldn't find a straightforward way to average the concentration data along the Z direction. I'm not sure how to set up a custom 2D Plot Group that can represent the average concentration.</li> <li>What I'm Looking For: A method to generate a 2D plot that shows the average concentration values in the XY plane, averaged along the Z direction. Suggestions or advice on how to export these results in a format that can be compared with my experimental data. I'd greatly appreciate any insights or recommendations you could provide to help me visualize and export this 2D projection properly.</li> </ul> <p>Thank you in advance for your help!</p> <p>Best regards, Francesc</p> Thu, 09 May 2024 11:11:08 +0000 4.2024-05-09 11:11:08.339341 How to calculate the co and cross polarized transmittance/reflectance in Comsol? https://www.comsol.com/forum/thread/339331/How-to-calculate-the-co-and-cross-polarized-transmittancereflectance-in-Comsol?last=2024-05-09T13:56:10Z <p>In Comsol, I want to calculate the Txx(transmittance to x polarized for incident x polarized), Txy(transmittance to x polarized for incident y polarized), Rxx, Rxy, and so on in comsol. S21/S11 never gives info about the particular polarization, it gives the overall transmittance and reflectance. But how to find these components in COMSOL?</p> Thu, 09 May 2024 04:27:11 +0000 4.2024-05-09 04:27:11.339331 Disabling variables in study step https://www.comsol.com/forum/thread/339322/Disabling-variables-in-study-step?last=2024-05-08T20:18:16Z <p>I am working on a heat transfer problem that requires me to calculate a variable (let's call it X, defined in "Variables 1") as the first step. X is defined as 2Y - 10, where Y is a state variable (defined in "State Variables 1") that is being updated after each timestep. In the second study step, I need to use the last computed value of the variable X in the physics and solve again. Which means that the variables should not be solved for in the second step.</p> <p>I am implementing a two study scheme, where in study 1, I run the physics while computing X and Y. In study 2, I am disabling "Variables 1" and "State Variables 1", and setting the values of the variables not computed for through the previous solution. When I run this, the first study runs successfully, but the second study throws an error saying variable X is not defined. I understand that this might be because I am disabling the variables in the study, but I am not sure how else to not solve for the variable and state variable in the second study, while still using the last stored values.</p> <p>Would be of great help if anyone can guide me to implement it properly.</p> <p>Thanks!</p> Wed, 08 May 2024 20:18:16 +0000 4.2024-05-08 20:18:16.339322 Failed to evaluate AWE expression. Not all parameter steps returned. https://www.comsol.com/forum/thread/339312/Failed-to-evaluate-AWE-expression-Not-all-parameter-steps-returned?last=2024-05-08T20:05:33Z <p>Hello,</p> <p>I am getting the error "Failed to evaluate AWE expression. Not all parameter steps returned." when running an Adaptive Frequency Sweep study for an Electromagnetic Waves, Frequency Domain physics. The model is a waveguide antenna with two lumped ports in a coaxial configuration. I run a "Frequency Domain Study" and it converges with no problem. But when I run "Adaptive Frequency Sweep" from 3 GHz to 4 GHz, in order to plot S11 parameters vs frequency, solution does not converge. I tried both Direct solving with MUMPs and Sugessted Iterative Solver, but they both did not converge. I am confused why this is the case since the "Frequency Domain" problem converges without a problem. Is it possible adaptive frequency sweep doesn't work properly when you have more than one excited lumped port?</p> <p>I can't attach my file as it is too large but I have attached a screen shot.</p> <p>Any information would be greatly appreciated.</p> Wed, 08 May 2024 20:05:33 +0000 4.2024-05-08 20:05:33.339312 Rapid solidification https://www.comsol.com/forum/thread/339302/Rapid-solidification?last=2024-05-08T19:16:08Z <p>Apologies, as I am fairly new to COMSOL.</p> <p>I am trying to simulate using a pulsed laser to melt and recrystallize silicon. Right now, I am just trying to model the rapid solidification after the melting has been done. I am doing a 2D simulation with a 10 um x 10 um piece of Si using heat transfer in solids and liquids with a time-dependent study. I am starting with a 100 nm thick layer of liquid Si at the top of the sample. For the sides, I have periodic boundary conditions, and the bottom is held at constant temperature. I also have surface-to-ambient radiation on the top surface. I give it an initial temperature distribution where the interface is at the melting point of Si, and then there is a linear temp distribution in the solid that goes from the melting temp to room temp. In the liquid layer, I set the top surface to be at a temperature higher than the melting temp and again use a linear temp distribution in that layer.</p> <p>What I am ultimately trying to get is the position of the liquid/solid interface as a function of time. Right now, it is working to the point that I can see the interface move towards the top surface with time, but the simulation gets an error at one point that is due to the mesh. Then it stops the simulation at that point, but it does give me all the data for the time points before that happens. I believe that when the liquid part is completely solidified, it has zero thickness, so when it tries to mesh, it can't make an appropriate mesh element, which is why it gives the error.</p> <p>I have two questions:</p> <ol> <li><p>Is there a way to tell the simulation to stop once the top layer is fully solidified so that I don't get this error?</p></li> <li><p>How can I extract the position of the interface as a function of time?</p></li> </ol> Wed, 08 May 2024 19:16:08 +0000 4.2024-05-08 19:16:08.339302 How to input a no rotation constraint https://www.comsol.com/forum/thread/339292/How-to-input-a-no-rotation-constraint-?last=2024-05-08T17:48:07Z <p>Im working on the same system I need to put a no rotation constrant on the top face of the lower flexure.</p> <p>I added the image of the location of the no rotation constrant and a pdf of the system. In addtion I attach the mph file of the system.</p> <p>What i did was I use a rigid connector at the location and constrant it rotation however I suspect it does not work correctly because in the first 2 mode the flexure is not bended correctly and the system was not rigid.</p> <p>If there an another way to put a no rotation constrant on the solid mechanics interface that will be perfect.</p> <p>Any help will be very useful.</p> Wed, 08 May 2024 17:47:45 +0000 4.2024-05-08 17:47:45.339292 Problem with magnetic field and solid mechanics https://www.comsol.com/forum/thread/339291/Problem-with-magnetic-field-and-solid-mechanics?last=2024-05-08T17:10:50Z <p>I’m trying to build a three-phase transformer to predict the sound in the core. But Im having problems computing my electromagnetic model so Im wondering if anyone could take time and take a look at my solid mechanics and the magnetic field? Thanks.</p> Wed, 08 May 2024 17:09:19 +0000 4.2024-05-08 17:09:19.339291 How to place a Point mass on COMSOL https://www.comsol.com/forum/thread/339282/How-to-place-a-Point-mass-on-COMSOL?last=2024-05-08T16:58:11Z <p>Good morning everyone,</p> <p>Im currently working on a Eigenfrequency Prestressed study.</p> <p>I want to put a point mass at the top face of the lower flexure (see the image below)</p> <p>I attached another image that show where i want the point mass (see the image with the blue arrow).</p> <p>For referance I attach the mph.file for the system that is used for the simulation and a image of what it look like.</p> <p>Before I put a point mass I use a cube with a very high density with interia and placed it where arrow is at but it won't be useful for long term research, and before I use a point load but it have no mass of interia.</p> <p>An idea that I have is to use a added mass load but it only for boundary but I am not sure it a correct substitute for the point mass.</p> <p>Any help or advice much appreciated thank you.</p> Wed, 08 May 2024 16:56:23 +0000 4.2024-05-08 16:56:23.339282 In the solid mechanics module, what is the difference between boundary load and external stress? https://www.comsol.com/forum/thread/339281/In-the-solid-mechanics-module-what-is-the-difference-between-boundary-load-and-external-stress?last=2024-05-08T15:39:01Z <p>I am exploring the solid mechanics module. My geometry is a simple square in 2D axisymmetry. I am using the nonlinear materials node.</p> <p>The equations of the boundary load node says</p> <p><img class="latexImg" src="" /></p> <p>Where, <em>as far as I understand</em>, S is the second Piola-Kirschoff stress and <strong>n</strong> is the column array containing the unit direction vectors. So the total stress tensor holds the contribution from the boundary load.</p> <p>Now, looking at the equations for nonlinear elastic material, firstly, inelastic stress is calculated as</p> <p><img class="latexImg" src="" /></p> <p>where the <img class="latexImg" src="" /> tensor can be defined in the external stress subnode. So the inelastic stress tensor holds the contribution from the external stress subnode. But again, total stress is calculated as</p> <p><img class="latexImg" src="" /></p> <p>Then the total stress tensor also holds the contribution from the external stress subnode.</p> <p>So the total stress tensor can hold the contributions from BOTH the boundary load node AND the external stress subnode. So it seems to me like the boundary load node and the external stress subnode are just two different approaches to achieving the same effect mathematically. I can add a certain amount of stress to my geometry in both ways.</p> <p>But surely, there must be a reason why they are implemented separately. Either I am wrong in thinking that they can both achieve the same numerical effect on the problem and they are actually totally different. Or even if the same <em>numerical</em> effect can be achieved in both ways, the two approaches might be <em>conceptually</em> different.</p> <p>I want to know how they are different and when one should use the external stress subnode rather than the boundary load node to apply stress. Can someone please explain? Thank you.</p> Wed, 08 May 2024 15:39:01 +0000 4.2024-05-08 15:39:01.339281 Change Thickness in 2D models https://www.comsol.com/forum/thread/339272/Change-Thickness-in-2D-models?last=2024-05-08T15:48:50Z <p>See my attached drawing for a visual description of my question: I have a simple 2D model of two rectangles. Lets say I set a thickness in Solid Mechanics (1m) but then use Change Thickness to change the blue rectangle to 1.5m. Will this add 0.25m to the thickness into the plane and 0.25m to the thickness out of the plane, thus keeping the orange rectangle centered in the out-of-plane dimension (figure A)? or will it add 0.5m to the thickness out of the plane so that the backside of both rectangles are aligned (figure B)?</p> Wed, 08 May 2024 15:19:10 +0000 4.2024-05-08 15:19:10.339272 Boundary condition for material layering in IGBT module to analyse thermal stress https://www.comsol.com/forum/thread/339271/Boundary-condition-for-material-layering-in-IGBT-module-to-analyse-thermal-stress?last=2024-05-08T14:16:12Z <p>Hi, I am making a model of an IGBT module. Currently I have used the Heat transfer in solids, but I want to add thermal stress, which automatically adds Solid mechanics interface. Here the default boudary is "free", but I am unsure wheter or not I have to change this to something else in between the layers. Does COMSOL automatically account for the stress between two types of different materials?</p> Wed, 08 May 2024 14:16:12 +0000 4.2024-05-08 14:16:12.339271 Coil problem https://www.comsol.com/forum/thread/339261/Coil-problem?last=2024-05-08T11:12:08Z <p>Good afternoon, I would like to know why when I use the magnetic and electric field, it does not compute and also, why when I use the magnetic field, my field is so big. Thank you in advance.</p> <p>BR, Juan Carlos Server</p> Wed, 08 May 2024 11:12:08 +0000 4.2024-05-08 11:12:08.339261 Complex 2D geometry from rigid and elastic beams with hinges in multibody dynamics https://www.comsol.com/forum/thread/339251/Complex-2D-geometry-from-rigid-and-elastic-beams-with-hinges-in-multibody-dynamics?last=2024-05-08T09:15:25Z <p>I am trying to set up a 2D system of maybe more than 100 individual beams, some of them rigid some of them elastic. The indidivual beams should be interconnected by hinges. And some simple load cases are to be studied. I am creating the geometry with lines as beams and also everything else in matlab.</p> <p>The problem is, to keep track which parts of the geometry are supposed to be rigid and which are elastic. If I only create one geometry, It is quite hard to track later which edge number belongs to which kind of beam as the sequence of edge numbers of the assembly is not connected to the geometry parts. Same for the vertices. If I create multiple geometries, the coupling in the multibody dynamics does not seem to work (I get a random Java error when trying to run a simulation). In the GUI I'm not even able to create multiple geometries.</p> <p>Is there any way of setting up a simulation like this and keep an overview? I'm just not sure how to divide the different kinds of beams and also if I can bundle several beams in one physics beam part.</p> Wed, 08 May 2024 09:15:24 +0000 4.2024-05-08 09:15:24.339251 Low quality mesh is generated when Meshing a Thin film on a thick metal https://www.comsol.com/forum/thread/339241/Low-quality-mesh-is-generated-when-Meshing-a-Thin-film-on-a-thick-metal-?last=2024-05-08T08:08:03Z <p>My model contains a block of 8mm&#42;8mm&#42;0.5mm copper block and coated with a 8mm&#42;8mm&#42;300nm Niobium. I am unable to mesh the model with air boundary. This model was meshed properly with no boundary conditions. Can you help me with a solution to mesh the block with air boundary condition.</p> Wed, 08 May 2024 06:49:23 +0000 4.2024-05-08 06:49:23.339241 Resource for COMSOL Tutorials https://www.comsol.com/forum/thread/339231/Resource-for-COMSOL-Tutorials?last=2024-05-08T06:05:30Z <p>Hello Everyone,</p> <p>I have previously worked in COMSOL for 3 years. I have recently started a Youtube channel on COMSOL tutorials to share what I have learnt, with others.</p> <p>The name of my channel is "COMSOL Multiphysics for Dummies"</p> <p>I would love to know your interests and possibly make tutorials on them. Let me know your feedback.</p> <p>I would also like to know the thoughts of my former COMSOL colleagues on the kind of tutorials which would be useful to the users.</p> <p>Regards, Rahul Bhat</p> Wed, 08 May 2024 06:05:30 +0000 4.2024-05-08 06:05:30.339231 How to perturb the solution of previous step when using parametric sweep? https://www.comsol.com/forum/thread/339221/How-to-perturb-the-solution-of-previous-step-when-using-parametric-sweep?last=2024-05-08T12:38:28Z <p>Hi there,</p> <p>I am trying to combine the time-dependent solver and parametric sweep to model the evolution of a system from trivial configuration to buckling and post-buckling configuration. The overall framework is like discussed in <a href="https://www.comsol.com/forum/thread/338363/is-it-possible-to-intervene-in-the-parameteric-sweep-of-time-dependent-solver?last=2024-05-03T02:57:31Z">this thread</a>.</p> <p>Because the trivial configuration is an equlibrium one though becomes unstable beyond the critical point, <strong>the solver is stuck to the trivial solution when the 'reuse solution from previous step' under the parametric sweep node is checked</strong>. See <a href="https://www.comsol.com/forum/thread/338821/about-the-reuse-solution-from-previous-step-in-parametric-sweep-and-time-depende?last=2024-04-29T12:29:41Z">another tread</a> for the example, where only the trivial solution can be obtained even far beyond the critical point.</p> <p><strong>I think a perturbation should be added to the pervious solution before proceeding with the current step. So, how to implement this in COMSOL?</strong></p> <p>Best regards,</p> <p>HC L</p> Wed, 08 May 2024 04:08:34 +0000 4.2024-05-08 04:08:34.339221